Skip to main content

Ħamrun Spartans FC vs NSÍ Runavík - AI Prediction & Analysis

71%confidence

Risk Level

high risk

Odds

Bookmaker Odds

Winner

Home1.50
Draw4.20
Away5.00

Double chance

1X1.11
X22.30
121.17

1st half

Home2.00
Draw2.30
Away6.00

Draw no bet

Home1.22
Away4.00

Both teams to score

Yes2.00
No1.73

Match goals

Over 0.51.04
Under 0.59.00
Over 1.51.25
Under 1.53.75
Over 2.51.80
Under 2.52.00
Over 3.53.00
Under 3.51.36
Over 4.55.50
Under 4.51.13
Over 5.59.00
Under 5.51.04
Over 6.515.00
Under 6.51.01
Over 7.521.00
Under 7.51.00

Asian handicap

(-1) Ħamrun Spartans FC1.90
(1) NSÍ Runavík1.90

Corners 2-Way

Over 9.51.73
Under 9.52.00

First team to score

Ħamrun Spartans FC1.44
No goal12.00
NSÍ Runavík2.88
Hidden Factors

Pressure Index

Ħamrun Spartans FC
4Medium
Moderate upset riskĦamrun Spartans FC: poor recent form

AI Analysis

How we predict

This is the second leg of a UEFA Conference League tie after a 1-1 draw in the Faroe Islands. Ħamrun Spartans are at home and must win to advance – a 0-0 draw would also send them through, but after conceding an away goal they cannot afford another draw with goals. NSÍ Runavík, on the other hand, know that any scoring draw (2-2, 3-3 etc.) would see them progress on away goals. This creates a clear motivational split: Ħamrun need to push for a win, while NSÍ can sit back and counter. Both teams have full squad availability with no known injuries or rotation risks. The prize is a place in the next qualifying round, so intensity will be high.

Ħamrun's recent home form is worrying. Over their last 5 home matches they won only 2, lost 2, drew 1. Their marker matches at this venue show they concede heavily: average xG against of 1.93 and 4.44 big chances against per game. They did beat Lincoln Red Imps 3-1 at home, but that was aided by a red card to the opposition. Their 1-1 draw away to NSÍ in the first leg was a fair result but exposed defensive frailties – they trailed 0-1 at half-time. NSÍ's only away marker match was a 5-0 defeat to HJK where they had a man sent off in the 15th minute, so that data is useless. Their domestic form is unknown due to lack of data, but they showed they can score in the first leg.

Both teams reported full squad availability. Ħamrun have 19 key players all available, NSÍ have 13. No injuries or suspensions are known. With the first leg just a week ago, both coaches are likely to field similar line-ups. Ħamrun coach Stefano Sanderra has continuity, while NSÍ coach Sigurdur Ragnar Eyjolfsson also stayed unchanged. Rotation risk is low given the importance of the tie.

Ħamrun are described as a defensive, corner-heavy, card-heavy side. However, their marker statistics tell a different story: they average 48.9% possession at home, not particularly defensive. They commit many fouls (15.33 per game) and earn many yellow cards (3.56), fitting the card-heavy tag. They also take many corners (5.33) but concede a fair number (3.00). NSÍ's style is unknown due to lack of data, but after scoring in the first leg they may adopt a counter-attacking approach. The tactical clash likely sees Ħamrun dominating possession and NSÍ looking to hit on the break. This can lead to a physical match with plenty of set pieces and cards.

Home markers for Ħamrun (sample of 5, relaxed filter): vs Shakhtar Donetsk (0-2): xG 0.23-2.89, big chances 0-7 – completely outclassed. vs Lincoln Red Imps (3-1): xG 2.20-1.11, BC 4-2, red card for opponent early in second half. vs Lausanne (0-1): xG 1.96-1.25, BC 3-3 – competitive. vs RFS (1-0): no stats but a narrow win. vs Dynamo Kyiv (0-3): no stats but heavy defeat. The pattern: when facing quality opposition, Ħamrun are leaky defensively and create little. Against weaker sides they are more competitive. NSÍ are likely below the level of Shakhtar and Dynamo but above Lincoln? Hard to judge. The first leg showed they are capable of creating chances – they led 0-1 at half-time. The tactical pattern from Ħamrun's markers is inconsistency: they struggle to keep clean sheets (only 1 in 5) and concede many big chances. Their own attacking output is modest (1.27 xG for).

Only one meeting: the first leg on 2026-07-09, which NSÍ led 1-0 at half-time before Ħamrun equalized. No xG data is available. Ħamrun were away and managed to get a result. That match suggests these teams are evenly matched, with NSÍ capable of scoring and Ħamrun able to respond. The continuity is high as both coaches are the same.

Due to very limited data, small market analysis is low confidence. Ħamrun's home averages: corners total 8.33 (over/under 10.5? Under might be value but line is 10.5), yellow cards total 7.12 (vs league avg 4.7, but referee Jeremy Muller averages only 2.85 yellows per match – likely under team average). Shots on target total 10.78, big chances total 6.44. First-half stats: Ħamrun score few 1H goals (0.00 avg), concede 0.39. NSÍ's 1H data from first leg: they scored in first half. Likely a low-scoring first half again.

Odds have moved heavily towards Ħamrun since opening: Home win from 2.10 to 1.65 (-21%), Draw from 3.30 to 3.80 (+15%), Away win from 3.00 to 4.10 (+37%). This suggests sharp money on Ħamrun, possibly based on their home advantage and need to win. Margin-removed fair probabilities: Home 54.4%, Draw 23.6%, Away 21.9%. Bookmaker odds imply Home 60.6%, so there is no clear value on Home – it's slightly overbet. However, the movement itself is a strong signal. Under 2.5 shortened from 2.15 to 1.85 (-14%), Over 2.5 drifted from 1.67 to 1.95 (+17%), indicating the market expects a lower-scoring game. Given Ħamrun's defensive issues but NSÍ's poor away marker, perhaps the total goals market is more reliable. I estimate Home win probability at 55% (fair odds 1.82), which is close to the offered 1.65 – no edge. Under 2.5 at 1.85: my estimate 60% (fair 1.67) – slight value on Under.

Alternative Variant
Winner - HomeMedium

Ħamrun need to win, have home advantage, and odds movement strongly supports them. Their marker matches show they beat weaker sides at home. NSÍ's only away data is a 0-5 loss. Back Ħamrun to get the job done.

1.65-6.0% EV