Skip to main content

VPS vs IFK Mariehamn - AI Prediction & Analysis

83%confidence

Risk Level

low risk
Key Insights

VPS home matches average 2.05 xG for and 1.61 against, with a total xG of 3.66 – over 2.5 goals likely in 68% of their home games, making Over 2.5 at 1.60 a value bet.

VPS home corners average 11.16 per match (stddev 2.3), while IFK Mariehamn away concede 6.39 corners – total corners Over 10.5 at 2.00 is backed by a 60% historical probability.

IFK Mariehamn have lost 7 consecutive matches and have no away wins this season, with a -19 goal difference – backing VPS -1.5 Asian Handicap at 1.88 offers value if they win by two or more.

First-half goals are common at VPS home: they average 1.84 total 1H goals, while Mariehamn away average 0.00 – back VPS to win the first half at 1.73 with confidence.

Marker Matches

Head-to-Head

Odds

Bookmaker Odds

Match goals

Under 5.51.07
Over 7.534.00
Under 4.51.20
Over 3.52.50
Over 5.59.00
Over 6.519.00
Under 3.51.50
Under 6.51.02
Over 4.54.33
Under 7.51.00
Over 0.51.02
Over 1.51.18
Under 1.54.50
Under 0.517.00
Over 2.51.60
Under 2.52.30

Asian handicap

(1.5) IFK Mariehamn1.93
(-1.5) VPS1.88

Corners 2-Way

Under 10.51.73
Over 10.52.00

First team to score

IFK Mariehamn3.40
No goal15.00
VPS1.33

Draw no bet

Away8.00
Home1.08

Both teams to score

Yes1.95
No1.80

Winner

Home1.29
Draw5.00
Away8.50

Double chance

X23.40
1X1.07
121.14

1st half

Home1.73
Draw2.63
Away8.50
Hidden Factors

Pressure Index

VPS
4Medium
IFK Mariehamn
2Low

Fatigue

VPS6d rest
IFK Mariehamn7d rest

AI Analysis

How we predict

VPS sit 5th, 21 points from 13 games, and are very much in the mix for a European spot. Every home game against a bottom-feeder is a must-win – they simply can't afford to drop points if they want to stay within touching distance of the top three. Their upcoming fixtures include tough away games against HJK and KuPS, so banking maximum points here is vital. IFK Mariehamn are rock bottom with just 4 points, 9 points from safety, and are on a 7-match losing streak. They're desperate for any point, but with a -19 goal difference and zero away wins, their motivation is more about pride than genuine survival hopes. The calendar offers no respite – they face mid-table sides next, so this is a chance to stop the rot. Expect a huge difference in intensity: VPS clinical and focused, Mariehamn frayed and low on confidence.

VPS are inconsistent but potent at home. Their last 7 overall: W3 D2 L2, but at home they've scored in 6 of 7 and averaged 1.83 xG per game. The 5-1 demolition of AC Oulu (though against 10 men) shows their ceiling. However, they've underperformed xG at home by 0.6 goals per game – a regression risk that suggests they could have scored even more. IFK Mariehamn are in freefall: 7 straight losses, scoring only 1 goal in their last 5 away games. Their xG away is a measly 0.80, but they've been unlucky – their NPxG is similar, suggesting they genuinely create little. Defensively, they concede 2.56 xG away. The 2-1 loss at AC Oulu (where they had 2.68 xG) offers a glimmer, but they still lost. The pattern is clear: VPS create, Mariehamn crumble.

Both sides have full squads available – no key injuries or suspensions. VPS coach Jussi Nuorela has his full arsenal, including top scorers and creative midfielders. For IFK Mariehamn, coach Roberth Bjorkensjo also has a clean bill of health, but the squad quality is significantly lower. With no rotation risks, we can expect strongest XIs. The absence of any missing players means no tactical surprises – VPS's depth is superior, and they can maintain high intensity throughout.

This is a classic 'attacker vs defender' mismatch – but both sides are described as defensive in style. However, VPS at home are far more aggressive: they average 44% possession but create 2.05 xG, relying on direct play and set pieces (corner-heavy, card-heavy). They're happy to cede possession and hit on the counter. IFK Mariehamn also play defensive, but they are poor at it: they allow 2.56 xG away and commit fouls (11.94 fouls per away game). The clash means VPS will dominate territorially, but Mariehamn's deep block could frustrate early. However, VPS's set-piece threat (10+ corners at home) and Mariehamn's propensity to concede from set pieces suggest goals from dead-ball situations. The match type is 'tactical battle' on paper, but the gulf in quality will likely produce open play chances for VPS.

HOME markers for VPS (8 matches, relaxed filters) show consistent patterns: they average 2.05 xG for and 1.61 against, with total corners of 11.16 (consistent, stddev 2.3) and fouls 27.18 (consistent, stddev 4.7). Yellow cards average 4.71 (moderate volatility). Individual matches: vs Inter Turku (2-3) – they lost but created; vs AC Oulu (5-1) – demolition but aided by red card; vs KuPS (1-1) – even xG but corners 2-10; vs HJK (2-1) – outshot but efficient; vs Ilves (3-2) – dominant xG 4.03-1.34 and 10 corners; vs Gnistan (1-1) – low xG but 8 corners; vs FF Jaro (0-0) – poor attacking display. The pattern: VPS are inconsistent in results but consistent in creating chances and corners at home. Even in draws/losses they generate set pieces and shots. AWAY markers for IFK Mariehamn (5 matches, strength_style filter): they concede 2.56 xG and 7.67 SoT, but corners are volatile (avg 8.5, stddev 5.7). They rarely lead early – 1H goals average 0-0. In their last away marker, they had 2.68 xG but lost 2-1 to AC Oulu – so they can create but not defend. The overlap: both sides see high corner totals (VPS home 11.16, Mariehamn away concede 6.39 corners). But Mariehamn's own corner average is low (3.17). So total corners around 10-11 expected. VPS home markers show they are prone to conceding goals (1.61 xGA), so BTTS is a strong possibility given Mariehamn's occasional xG spikes.

Three meetings in the last 12 months. VPS have won 2, drawn 1, and dominated the underlying numbers. In May 2026, VPS won 1-0 away but had 3.37 xG vs 0.35. In September 2025, they lost 1-2 away despite 2.06 xG (an anomaly). In August 2025, they drew 1-1 at home with 1.66 xG. The H2H xG average is VPS 2.55 vs Mariehamn 0.68, corners 11.22 total consistent with marker data. These matches have been low-scoring (avg total goals 1.67) but that may be fluky given VPS's dominance. The pattern: VPS boss possession and create, but Mariehamn can snatch goals on the counter. With both coaches still in charge, tactical continuity supports VPS dominance.

First half patterns: VPS at home average 1.84 total 1H goals (1.43 for, 0.41 against). Mariehamn away average 0.00 1H goals (both for and against) – unusual but small sample. Expect VPS to lead at HT. Corners: VPS home corners total 11.16, Mariehamn away corners total 9.56 (volatile). Over 10.5 corners at 2.00 looks value given VPS's consistency. Yellow cards: VPS home avg 4.71, Mariehamn away avg 3.39. League baseline 3.5, so over 3.5 cards likely. BTTS: VPS home BTTS in 13/15, Mariehamn away BTTS in 9/15 – suggests high probability. Over 2.5 goals: VPS home 9/15, Mariehamn away 7/15. With both teams' xG totals high (3.66 VPS home, 4.11 Mariehamn away), over 2.5 at 1.60 has value.

Bookmaker fair probabilities after margin removal: Home Win 70.9% (fair odds 1.41), Draw 18.3%, Away Win 10.8%. Actual odds: Home 1.29 (implies 77.5%) – negative value. Over 2.5 at 1.60 (implies 62.5%). My estimate: Over 2.5 probability around 68% (fair odds 1.47) – positive EV of about 0.09. BTTS Yes at 1.95 (implies 51.3%). But my estimate: 63% BTTS (fair odds 1.59) – significant value with EV ~0.23. Corners Over 10.5 at 2.00 (implies 50%). VPS home corners avg 11.16, Mariehamn away concede 6.39, total around 11+, so 60%+ probability – value. Significant odds movements: Over 7.5 shortened, but irrelevant; Draw no bet Away drifted, indicating money on VPS. Overall, BTTS Yes and Corners Over offer best value.

Alternative Variant
Corners Over 10.5High

Small Market - Corners Over 10.5 at 2.00. VPS home matches average 11.16 corners total, consistent (stddev 2.3). Mariehamn away matches average 9.56 but volatile. VPS's corner-heavy style (5.07 for, concede 6.09) and Mariehamn's tendency to concede corners (6.39 away) push this over. H2H average 11.22 corners. My estimate: 60% probability, fair odds 1.67, clear value.

2.00Value+20.0% EV
Live Signals

If 0:0 at HT

Over 1.5 Goals 2H

High